﻿WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.105 --> 00:00:02.688
[upbeat music]

2
00:00:10.270 --> 00:00:13.090
<v Narrator>With massive user basis and tiny payout rates</v>

3
00:00:13.090 --> 00:00:16.630
streaming services offer a conundrum for modern music fans.

4
00:00:16.630 --> 00:00:18.300
How to best support musicians

5
00:00:18.300 --> 00:00:20.420
when the easiest way to listen to their recordings

6
00:00:20.420 --> 00:00:22.208
often barely pays them at all.

7
00:00:22.208 --> 00:00:25.720
As of early 2018, Spotify claims some

8
00:00:25.720 --> 00:00:28.010
140 million active users,

9
00:00:28.010 --> 00:00:30.480
70 million of whom are paid subscribers.

10
00:00:30.480 --> 00:00:33.730
But as Damon Krukowski of the bands Galaxie 500

11
00:00:33.730 --> 00:00:35.690
and Damon &amp; Naomi discovered,

12
00:00:35.690 --> 00:00:38.210
Spotify only dollops out less than half a cent

13
00:00:38.210 --> 00:00:39.600
per streamed track.

14
00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:42.840
What's more, as a report by BuzzAngle pointed out,

15
00:00:42.840 --> 00:00:45.360 line:15% 
the top 10% of most-streamed tracks

16
00:00:45.360 --> 00:00:48.550 line:15% 
account for more than 99 of all streams.

17
00:00:48.550 --> 00:00:50.530
Which means that the vast majority of music

18
00:00:50.530 --> 00:00:52.850
in Spotify's database is getting listened to

19
00:00:52.850 --> 00:00:55.180
less than 1% of the time.

20
00:00:55.180 --> 00:00:58.510
The digital rising tide is lifting only some ships.

21
00:00:58.510 --> 00:01:00.560
Krukowski has some suggestions for how to be

22
00:01:00.560 --> 00:01:03.273 line:15% 
a responsible music fan in the age of Spotify.

23
00:01:04.360 --> 00:01:06.030
In part he suggests,

24
00:01:06.030 --> 00:01:08.870
listeners should consider where their dollars are going.

25
00:01:08.870 --> 00:01:10.360
Even with a subscription,

26
00:01:10.360 --> 00:01:12.860
using Spotify to listen to anything more obscure

27
00:01:12.860 --> 00:01:14.740
than those top 10% of songs

28
00:01:14.740 --> 00:01:17.250
won't support the musicians who made them.

29
00:01:17.250 --> 00:01:20.860
Instead, he suggests that looking for musical experiences

30
00:01:20.860 --> 00:01:22.480
with the richest personal impact

31
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:25.210
is one way to bypass the streaming paradox.

32
00:01:25.210 --> 00:01:28.890
One method for doing this is to adjust one's sense of scale.

33
00:01:28.890 --> 00:01:31.130
Krukowski compares it to the difference between seeing

34
00:01:31.130 --> 00:01:34.220
the same act at a festival versus seeing them at a club.

35
00:01:34.220 --> 00:01:35.950
They might get paid similar rates,

36
00:01:35.950 --> 00:01:39.450
but at a club you're not standing among 10,000 other fans.

37
00:01:39.450 --> 00:01:41.250
You can see the band up close.

38
00:01:41.250 --> 00:01:42.718
They can probably see you.

39
00:01:42.718 --> 00:01:45.110
And your merch table dollars might go directly

40
00:01:45.110 --> 00:01:46.298
toward their next meal.

41
00:01:46.298 --> 00:01:49.630
While you might get less music per dollar in the short term,

42
00:01:49.630 --> 00:01:51.000
your money will go further to power

43
00:01:51.000 --> 00:01:54.214
the independent musical ecosystem in the long haul.

44
00:01:54.214 --> 00:01:57.360
Another way to support music, Krukowski suggests,

45
00:01:57.360 --> 00:02:00.020
is to understand and share it's context.

46
00:02:00.020 --> 00:02:02.260
Playlists, the primary engagement point

47
00:02:02.260 --> 00:02:03.709
for many streaming services,

48
00:02:03.709 --> 00:02:06.740
often strip away information about who wrote a song,

49
00:02:06.740 --> 00:02:09.120
played on it, recorded it and issued it.

50
00:02:09.120 --> 00:02:13.250
Instead, the listeners only experiences the playlist itself.

51
00:02:13.250 --> 00:02:15.387 line:15% 
But as historian Howard Zinn argued,

52
00:02:15.387 --> 00:02:17.970 line:15% 
"Archiving can be a form of activism."

53
00:02:17.970 --> 00:02:19.810
Can reclaiming music's context,

54
00:02:19.810 --> 00:02:21.400
valuing the labor that goes into it

55
00:02:21.400 --> 00:02:23.070
and sharing information combat

56
00:02:23.070 --> 00:02:26.340
the one size fits all monoliths of Spotify and Apple?

57
00:02:26.340 --> 00:02:28.630
There's always power in information.

58
00:02:28.630 --> 00:02:30.230
Also important is to think about

59
00:02:30.230 --> 00:02:33.390
the alternate distribution systems that already exist.

60
00:02:33.390 --> 00:02:35.320
The masquerade of streaming services

61
00:02:35.320 --> 00:02:37.580
is that they seem like a model of sharing.

62
00:02:37.580 --> 00:02:40.440
And yet these services are run by large corporations

63
00:02:40.440 --> 00:02:42.560
profiting from intellectual property.

64
00:02:42.560 --> 00:02:45.080
The opposite of truly free sharing.

65
00:02:45.080 --> 00:02:46.880
Alternative models like Bandcamp

66
00:02:46.880 --> 00:02:49.330
can earn money for artists without stripping their music

67
00:02:49.330 --> 00:02:52.720
of its context or removing it from the artist's control.

68
00:02:52.720 --> 00:02:55.630
Even the free exchange of live recordings between listeners

69
00:02:55.630 --> 00:02:57.980
can provide a fan driven alternative that restores

70
00:02:57.980 --> 00:02:59.904
some of the music's autonomy.

71
00:02:59.904 --> 00:03:02.900
Perhaps most important is to not only share,

72
00:03:02.900 --> 00:03:04.270
but share deliberately.

73
00:03:04.270 --> 00:03:06.898
Share your money in ways it will have a real effect.

74
00:03:06.898 --> 00:03:10.320
Share the context of what you know both online and off.

75
00:03:10.320 --> 00:03:12.260
Support organizations and websites

76
00:03:12.260 --> 00:03:14.540
that foreground engagement with metadata

77
00:03:14.540 --> 00:03:17.090
and provide opportunities to go deeper into the details

78
00:03:17.090 --> 00:03:19.730
of the music, like the website, Discogs.

79
00:03:19.730 --> 00:03:22.300
And share your loves of the music itself.

80
00:03:22.300 --> 00:03:23.940
It's a powerful action.

81
00:03:23.940 --> 00:03:26.110
Powerful enough that some of the biggest corporations

82
00:03:26.110 --> 00:03:28.020
in the world feel threatened by it.

83
00:03:28.020 --> 00:03:29.020
Let them.

84
00:03:29.020 --> 00:03:30.423
Another world is possible.

